Without topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Without topic - Essay Exampletype of a delusion is highly common among politicians who, rather than commenting on the issue at hand, try to whang the other party in order to create hype especially among the media. This successfully distracts the opponent as well as the audience and media from the question or issue at hand. These personal comments might even affect a voters opinion about the opponents political position. oneness recent example of this fallacy is when President Obama, during his speech, said that Gov. Romney would ask the middle class to pay more in taxes to give another $250,000 tax repress to people making more than $3 million a year. Its like Robin Hood in reverse. Its Romney Hood (Scott Neuman, Web).It is clear that President Obama is trying to brush aside this opponent Gov. Romney by saying that he would introduce such a system in which the people belonging to the middle class would be taxed high and people who are rich would benefit. This statement might t urn the middle class people against Gov. Romney. As a response to this statement, Gov Romney said that, Weve been watching the chairwoman say a lot of things about me and my policies, and theyre just not right. And if I were to coin a term, it would be Obamaloney (Scott Neuman, Web). This is a clear example of an Ad Hominem fallacy as both the opponents are trying to damage the reputation of each other in order to gather high voted from the public. They tried to comment on the policies and even gave each other names like Romney hood and Obamaloney.Analysis of Argumentum Ad Logicam is a type of fallacy in which a person creates a disagreeable argument before disclosing the actual argument as it is easier to defeat the real case. It is also known as a straw man fallacy as a person creates a sketch of the opponent in his mind (straw man) in order to counter the opponents argument.An example of this fallacy is president Obamas recent statement against Gov. Romney in which he says that, Were certainly not